Upon submission, the editorial team performs an initial check for completeness, formatting compliance, scope relevance, and adherence to ethical standards. Papers that do not meet basic requirements will be returned to authors.
Eligible papers are assigned to at least two independent expert reviewers in the relevant field. Both author and reviewer identities are concealed throughout the process. Reviewers evaluate originality, methodology, results, and contribution to the field.
Based on reviewer feedback, the editorial committee makes one of four decisions: Accept, Minor Revision, Major Revision, or Reject. Authors are notified by email with detailed reviewer comments.
Authors of papers requiring revision must submit a revised manuscript together with a point-by-point response to the reviewers' comments within the specified deadline.
Accepted papers must be presented at the conference. Post-conference, accepted and presented papers will be processed for publication in the indexed journals (Scopus, Sinta, JSKK, JPJO).